USE CASE · ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
Compare explanations against shared evidence.
Root-cause work should reject weak theories in the open—not race to the first plausible story from one team's tools.
Teams argue from incomplete views: one service's metrics vs another team's logs, with no shared way to test competing explanations.
02 · AutoObserve
How AutoObserve addresses it
Investigations keep hypotheses, evidence, and confidence in one place so teams can reject weak theories and strengthen the one that fits the system.
CHECKOUT INCIDENT · EXPLANATION LENS
Competing theories converge on one deployment-backed explanation.
The shared investigation tests whether checkout degradation traces to checkout-api v2.14.7, dependency failure, or noise—and keeps confidence tied to evidence every role can see.
03 · Resolution
What changes operationally
Root-cause work becomes comparative evidence evaluation—not a race to the first plausible story.